NEWS

Business under reinforced concrete pressure

The structural specific of the building nearly became the reasons of business closing.

The specific structure of the building nearly became the reason of imminent business closure. But obviously the negative impacts were avoided due to the fact that The Business Ombudsman in Moscow region Vladimir Golovnev supported a company owner in Bogorodsky urban district. Thus this intervention could prevent further long court proceedings.

In last October there was an exceptional check in a food store provided with ‘no warning mode’ by inspectors of the State Building Supervision in Moscow region. They checked construction works being performed inside the store building for compliance with the technical regulation requirements and project documentation.

This building was built in early 1990-th and apparently has its own design characteristics. Exactly it became the reason of emerged conflict situation: during  this  inspection the supervisors mistakenly revealed an installation  of reinforced concrete constructions without planning permission (in violation of the requirement of article 51 of City Planning Code).

The supervisors issued a controversial report and submitted it to the City Hall. The city authorities  organized their own investigation, which mistakenly reconfirm controversial findings made by the State Building Supervision. The only expected result for the business would be a mandatory closure.

With the object to approve the investigation results and  to issue an order of mandatory demolition  the administration of Bogorodsky urban district filed a lawsuit in Noginsk city court.

The defendant party requested the business ombudsman to intervene into the lawsuit as the third party. The intervention played a role of a balance in the court and the interests of the defendant were fully protected.

During the judicial hearings held in the end of May the local authority had actually dropped the case and exited from the lawsuit. Eventually the lawsuit was considered without consequences and therefore dropped (article 222 of  Civil Procedure Code of Russian Federation).

Автор: Yulia Martynova, Oxana Smirnova
Источник: Vladimir Golovnev’s Press Service

комментарии:

Для добавления комментариев вам необходимо авторизоваться.
Если вы еще не зарегистрированы на сайте, вы можете сделать это здесь.

войти

В этом разделе

Календарь

понвтрсрдчетпятсубвск
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
       

Ключевые слова

Boris Titov Business Ombudsman Moscow region Protection of Business Protection of the Business The Moscow Business Ombudsman The Moscow Region Business Ombudsman Vladimir Golovnev Vladimir Golovnyov protection of the rights of entrepreneurs Андрей Воробьев Балашиха Борис Титов Владимир Головнев Защита прав предпринимателей МСП Московская область Налоги Общественная приемная Подмосковье Правительство МО Правительство Московской области Прием предпринимателей Прокуратура Прокуратура Московской области Роспотребнадзор Уполномоченный Уполномоченный по защите прав предпринимателей в Московской области ФНС ФНС России Химки Экспертный Совет бизнес бизнес в Подмосковье бизнес-омбудсмен бизнес-омбудсмен Московской области бизнес-омбудсмен Подмосковья вебинар мособлдума наше подмосковье обращения общественные приемные поддержка МСП поддержка бизнеса подмосковье для бизнеса предприниматели предприниматели подмосковья проверки производство работа с обращениями

Забыли пароль?